Research Dossier · NCES 270002602121 · Rosemount, Minnesota
917 Idea
Not yet researched
This school hasn't been run through the evidence-harvest pipeline yet. Start a full research run to gather sources, extract evidence, and score the school's next-gen learning model.
School details
School data
Report-card and local mirror data organized for researcher triage. This context helps decide what to verify next; it does not count as evidence for the Star Search rubric.
- Teachers (FTE)
- 7.5
- Full-time-equivalent teachers
- Pupil / teacher ratio
- 4.9
- Profile year 2025
- Per-pupil spending
- -
- Not reported
- AP / dual access
- 0
- Dual enrollment 0%
Research takeaways
Practical signals to guide the next read: what to verify, what may need context, and what could shape outreach.
- Achievement watch
Across latest tested groups, school proficiency averages 47.4 points below state, useful for equity or support questions.
- Advanced access signal
Local coursework data shows AP, IB, dual enrollment, or advanced STEM participation.
Test proficiency against benchmarks
Percent of tested students meeting the standard, compared with district and state where available.
Equity and student mix
Student composition and need indicators. Percentages are shares of enrolled students unless noted.
Change over time
Enrollment, FRL eligibility, rank percentile, and outcomes over the years available.
Outcomes and attendance
School rates compared with district and state. Trend charts overlay the state rate where available.
Advanced coursework access
Course access and participation from local school-board data. Participation percentages are student shares.
- Calculus
- 0%
- Computer science
- 0%
- Physics
- 0%
- Dual enrollment
- 0%
Operating context
Identity, contact, and verification anchors that help analysts validate the school before outreach.
Check source detailsOriginal source records remain available for analysts who need to verify exact values.Source details
Rank history
| Year | Ranking level | Rank | State percentile | Average score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 | High | 475 / 539 | 11.9% | 7 |
| 2011 | High | 516 / 545 | 5.3% | 4.4 |
| 2010 | High | 525 / 540 | 2.8% | 3.7 |
Demographic history
| Year | Students | FRL eligible | White | Black | Hispanic | Asian | Two+ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 37 | 56.8% | 35.1% | 32.4% | 13.5% | 0% | 18.9% |
| 2024 | 36 | 75% | 27.8% | 27.8% | 27.8% | 0% | 16.7% |
| 2023 | 43 | 81.4% | 30.2% | 18.6% | 32.6% | 0% | 14% |
| 2022 | 47 | 53.2% | 36.2% | 23.4% | 21.3% | 0% | 17% |
| 2021 | 57 | 59.7% | 36.8% | 22.8% | 21.1% | 0% | 17.5% |
| 2020 | 46 | 76.1% | 37% | 23.9% | 21.7% | 0% | 17.4% |
| 2019 | 50 | 78% | 36% | 18% | 18% | 0% | 24% |
| 2018 | 49 | 83.7% | 32.7% | 24.5% | 24.5% | 0% | 16.3% |
Latest assessment results
| Year | Assessment | Subject | Grade | School met standard | District met standard | State met standard | Students tested |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | MCA-III | Math | 14 | 0% | 5.6% | 45.2% | 17 |
| 2025 | MCA-III | Reading | 14 | 0% | 11.6% | 49.6% | 13 |
Recent test history
| Year | Subject | Grade | School met standard | State met standard | Students tested |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Math | 14 | 0% | 45.2% | 17 |
| 2025 | Reading | 14 | 0% | 49.6% | 13 |
| 2024 | Math | 14 | 11.1% | 45.5% | 18 |
| 2024 | Reading | 14 | 0% | 49.9% | 14 |
| 2023 | Math | 14 | 0% | 45.5% | 14 |
| 2023 | Reading | 14 | 0% | 49.9% | 15 |
| 2022 | Math | 14 | 0% | 44.8% | 22 |
| 2022 | Reading | 14 | 5.9% | 51.1% | 17 |
| 2021 | Math | 14 | 0% | 44.2% | 18 |
| 2021 | Reading | 14 | 5.9% | 52.5% | 17 |
| 2017 | Science | 13 | 0% | 56% | 11 |
| 2014 | Science | 13 | 15.4% | 53.2% | 13 |
| 2012 | Reading | 10 | 33.4% | 76.8% | 15 |
| 2012 | Reading | 10 | 40% | 80.4% | 15 |
| 2011 | Mathematics | 11 | 0% | 48.6% | 14 |
| 2011 | Math | 11 | 7.1% | 59.2% | 14 |
| 2011 | Writing | 9 | 40% | 89.1% | 10 |
| 2010 | Mathematics | 11 | 0% | 43.2% | 10 |
| 2010 | Mathematics | 8 | 0% | 58.5% | 10 |
| 2010 | Reading | 10 | 20% | 75.3% | 15 |